How much is the market expected to move?
The market is currently pricing S&P 500 moves of about 1.178% per day. Over the next month that is roughly ±5.36% either way, about two-thirds of the time.
Options are priced around their historical middle.
This is what the options market expects — not a forecast of direction, and not a suggestion to trade options.
Index Volatility
normalReal implied volatility for the S&P 500 index complex — the only place a keyless implied-vol source exists. Single-name options stay on a clearly-labelled realized-vol proxy.
What the evidence says about selling vs buying options
For selling premium: Implied vol has exceeded subsequent realized vol in 20 of 21 years (1998-2018, avg implied/realized ~129%); Cboe's PUT writing index earned a higher Sharpe than the S&P 500 (0.64 vs 0.45) with lower volatility.
Against — the tail risk: That premium is payment for crash risk, not free money: the PUT index carries far worse tails (skew -2.10 vs -0.81; kurtosis 9.72 vs 2.53), and option-writing UNDERPERFORMED the index through the 2010-2018 low-vol bull. Losses concentrate in sudden large moves.
On buying protection: Long-vol/protective structures pay off in crashes but bleed otherwise: continuously buying 5% OTM SPX puts (1996-2016) cut returns from 5.1% to 1.8% and Sharpe from 0.32 to 0.14.
Basis: implied (VIX, 30d forward-looking) vs realized (trailing 21d of S&P 500). Trailing realized is an observable proxy — the true VRP needs the NEXT 30 days, which is unknowable today.
Skew: not shown — 25-delta put/call skew needs an option chain. Cboe's delayed chain JSON explicitly prohibits automated extraction, and FRED carries no SKEW series — so skew is omitted rather than approximated.
CBOE VIX close (VIXCLS, FRED gateway, daily since 1990)
VIX (VIXCLS) vs VIX3M (VXVCLS), FRED gateway
VIX (VIXCLS) vs 21d realized vol of S&P 500 (SP500), both FRED gateway
S&P 500 close (SP500) x VIX implied vol
Educational volatility analytics for the index complex. Not a trade signal, not a recommendation to sell or buy options.
Futures & options ideas
Futures and options are advanced tools. These idea cards show what the agents see — tap one to learn more before you ever consider trading it.
Research comes before a trade
The agents now check strategy history, costs, data quality, holdout tests, and paper results. If those checks are missing, the idea stays research-only instead of becoming a Buy or Sell signal.
No derivatives setup has passed every evidence gate yet. The agents will keep monitoring.
Futures & options
Futures and options are powerful but advanced. Here’s what the agents see in plain words — always learn how one works before you ever consider trading it.
Research only. CL systematic research: bullish multi-horizon trend; curve carry unavailable. Evidence status insufficient_data. Still needed: exact contract roll history, exact contract expiries, estimated costs.
Research only. GC_OPTIONS options research: IV-realized spread -0.058 (cheap); evidence status insufficient_data. Still needed: bid ask, open interest volume, rates.
No futures or options ideas from the agents right now — check back after the next run.
Want the futures curve, open interest, implied vol and Greeks? Switch to Pro in the top bar for the full desk.
AI analysis to study, not orders to follow. You always decide.
Derivatives Intelligence
Futures and Options Agents
Deterministic futures curve, open-interest, implied-volatility, skew, Greeks, and strategy-family analytics. Scenario guidance only — not guaranteed signals.
6 gates missing: exact contract roll history · exact contract expiries…
11 gates missing: bid ask · open interest volume…
Futures consensus is mixed with 0.5 agreement.
CLQ26/CLU26: -4.4 · CLU26/CLV26: 4.16
GCQ26/GCV26: -28.1 · GCV26/GCZ26: -30.8
Bullish upside idea: pay premium for call exposure when the agent expects the underlying to rise and IV is not too expensive. Evidence: Building evidence; research only.
Crude futures research
Multi-horizon trend + curve carry
Blend 20/60/120-day direction, then size by volatility and portfolio concentration limits.
Use annualized contract carry with exact expiries; raw contango/backwardation alone is not a trade rule.
exact contract roll history · exact contract expiries · estimated costs · independent holdout · forward paper · net expectancy after costs
vendor continuous roll unknown
Gold futures research
Multi-horizon trend + curve carry
Blend 20/60/120-day direction, then size by volatility and portfolio concentration limits.
Use annualized contract carry with exact expiries; raw contango/backwardation alone is not a trade rule.
exact contract roll history · exact contract expiries · estimated costs · independent holdout · forward paper · net expectancy after costs
vendor continuous roll unknown
Options evidence lab
VRP + covered/collateralized benchmarks
Only harvest rich implied volatility with capped loss, executable quotes, costs, event controls, and tail stress.
Premium cushions some downside but caps upside; compare with the Cboe BXM methodology.
Premium income accepts equity-like crash drawdown and requires full collateral; compare with Cboe PUT.
Long premium only when the realized/event forecast can exceed executable implied volatility plus spread and decay.
bid ask · open interest volume · rates · dividends or forward · exercise settlement · estimated costs · event calendar · full chain history 5y · independent holdout · forward paper · net expectancy after costs
proxy underlying
Positioning
Futures positioning — CFTC COT
Net speculative futures positioning, updated weekly (Friday for Tuesday data). COT index: 0 = most short of the last ~3y, 100 = most long. Extremes flag crowding — they do not time reversals.
Index futures use TFF leveraged funds; commodities use Disaggregated managed money.
Five-Year Daily Market History
Descriptive context only. Continuous futures can contain roll effects, and GLD is an ETF proxy for gold-options exposure—not options-chain history. These snapshots do not qualify futures or options evidence gates.
Crude oil continuous futures
1257 daily observations · 2021-07-26T00:00:00.000Z to 2026-07-24T00:00:00.000Z
Gold continuous futures
1257 daily observations · 2021-07-26T00:00:00.000Z to 2026-07-24T00:00:00.000Z
GLD ETF (gold-options proxy)
1255 daily observations · 2021-07-26T00:00:00.000Z to 2026-07-24T00:00:00.000Z
Institutional analytics
Research analytics, non-executing by design
Derivatives views add futures curve and options volatility diagnostics as measured data becomes available.
Portfolio risk
Exposure, leverage, concentration, and drawdown analytics are built on versioned market data. Values appear only when they trace to a trusted dataset — nothing is estimated for display.
Factors and scenarios
Factor exposures and stress scenarios are computed only where a measured data source exists, and every shock definition is stated explicitly.
Execution quality
Spread, slippage, and other cost analytics stay educational until measured cost evidence passes deterministic checks.
Curve + Direction + Flow Agents
CL
CLQ26/CLU26: -4.4 · CLU26/CLV26: 4.16
GC
GCQ26/GCV26: -28.1 · GCV26/GCZ26: -30.8
CL roll economics
CLQ26 → CLU26 · curve is contango
GC roll economics
GCQ26 → GCV26 · curve is contango
CL curve is mixed with M1-M2 spread -4.4.
CL directional model is bullish: regression slope 1.586%/bar (R² 0.90) with 7.31% five-bar momentum. Plan: stop 80.8441, target 104.125, typical hold ~11 trading days (window 4-11), time-stop 40.
Event/supply risk score is 0.72.
Open interest flow shows long_liquidation.
Futures consensus is mixed with 0.5 agreement.
Speculative net positioning +2,005 w/w (COT idx 30, report 2026-07-21). Crowding flags squeeze risk — it does not time reversals.
GC curve is contango with M1-M2 spread -28.0999.
GC directional model is bearish: regression slope -0.034%/bar (R² 0.02) with 1.51% five-bar momentum. Plan: stop 4227.06, target 3797.34, typical hold ~40 trading days (window 5-40), time-stop 40.
Event/supply risk score is 0.35.
Open interest flow shows short_covering.
Futures consensus is bearish with 0.25 agreement.
Speculative net positioning +4,052 w/w (COT idx 62, report 2026-07-21). Crowding flags squeeze risk — it does not time reversals.
Vol Surface Snapshot
IV, Skew, Term, Greeks, Strategy
Greeks risk scan completed with deterministic threshold checks.
IV is cheap versus realized volatility; expected move is 3.03%.
Options consensus is neutral with 0.5 agreement.
Options skew is balanced.
long call selected for bullish underlying bias, cheap implied volatility, balanced skew, and balanced term structure. Research only: evidence status insufficient_data.
GC_OPTIONS options research: IV-realized spread -0.058 (cheap); evidence status insufficient_data.
Underlying context is bullish.
Vol term structure is balanced.
Current Options Playbook
This is the options strategy recommender. It turns the current gold-options read — direction, IV regime, skew, term structure, and Greeks risk — into a plain-English strategy family. It is not a historical log.
Bullish upside idea: pay premium for call exposure when the agent expects the underlying to rise and IV is not too expensive.
Evidence: Building evidence · research onlyCurrent read: long call selected for bullish underlying bias, cheap implied volatility, balanced skew, and balanced term structure.Inputs: direction bullish · IV cheap · skew balanced · term balancedRisk: Scenario guidance only; confirm strikes, liquidity, spread width, and event risk before any trade.Invalidation: Invalidate if direction flips, IV regime changes, skew reprices, or term structure no longer supports the setup.Expiry: 45-60Profit-take: Scale out at +50% to +100% of the premium paid, or at the underlying's 3.5x-ATR target.Stop: Exit if the underlying bias flips bearish or the option loses half the premium paid.Timing: Exit or roll once 21 days to expiry remain — theta decay accelerates from there, so profit must come in the first half of the hold.Sources: spot yahoo daily · IV yahoo options:GLD (gold ETF proxy) + GVZCLS iv-history72% model score