Nasdaq 100 ETF: Trending (ADX 21). Likely range over the next 5 sessions is about 658.15–710.30. Bearish lean, low conviction. This is context, not a prediction.

The read — Nasdaq 100 ETF

plain-English synthesis
Regime
Trending (ADX 21) · aligned
Likely range (5d)
658.15 – 710.30 ±3.811% · 1σ from realized volatility (~2 in 3 sessions stay inside)
Lean
Bearish lean · Low conviction Reads here have been right 29% of 7 calls (5-day horizon).
Wrong if
Wrong if price closes above 712.569 (2x ATR) or the trend gate drops.

Not a prediction of where price will go. The Fair-Value-Gap, Fibonacci and market-structure lines are descriptive context we measured — they don’t beat random after costs. AI analysis to study, not orders to follow — you always decide, and never risk money you can’t afford to lose.

← All markets
NAS

Nasdaq 100 ETF

equity
684.23▼ 1.12% today
Need evidenceChart leans down5 of 5 timeframes falling — aligned down
50%model scoreLow conviction1D descriptive chart read

What the agents think

Need evidence: Required market, cost, or validation evidence is missing. Strategy: Strategy Research Pipeline. Net-positive-return probability: Not established.

Bearish read on QQQ: down trend with strength 0.46 (ADX 21). Backtested hit rate for this signal grade is about 50% over 5 days.

Reasons it could go up: Confirmation improves if Nasdaq 100 ETF holds above near-term support while dependency conflicts fade.

Reasons it could go down: The setup weakens if macro drivers reverse or price closes through the invalidation level.

Chart read changes if: Wrong if price closes above 712.569 (2x ATR) or the trend gate drops.

What would this cost me?

What would this cost me?

If Nasdaq 100 ETF reached 712.5693, the idea is wrong and you would be out. This works out what that costs on your account. Nothing here is a recommendation to take the trade — it is the price of being wrong.

Before you act — the A+ check

A+ setup check

Run down the checklist before you act on Nasdaq 100 ETF. This is discipline, not a signal — a green gate means you aren’t forcing the trade, not that it will win.

  1. I wrote why the idea is wrong at 712.5693
  2. Reward:risk is at least :1
    This read has no target price, so reward:risk can't be computed. Treat that as a reason for caution, not a pass.
  3. I sized from risk, not from gut

0 of 2 checks — this is a B-setup. The edge is in passing on these. Trades are like buses; another comes along.

What might happen next

Continuation

What to monitor
Price respects the current regime and dependency confirmation remains intact.

Invalidation

What to monitor
Wrong if price closes above 712.569 (2x ATR) or the trend gate drops.

Markets that move with this one

REAREALYIELDS · moves loosely in opposite directions · measured from live dataSeeSPYSPY · moves strongly in the same directionSeeVIXVIX · moves moderately in opposite directions · measured from live dataSee

Want the numbers behind this? Switch to Pro in the top bar for charts, agent scores, and levels — or ask the agents to run a fresh analysis.

Ask the agents

Nasdaq 100 ETF

← All marketsSwitch to Pro in the top bar for full charts, levels & agent scores
Need evidence: Nasdaq 100 ETFChart leans down on the 1D chart
684.23▼ 1.12% today

Bearish read on QQQ: down trend with strength 0.46 (ADX 21). Backtested hit rate for this signal grade is about 50% over 5 days.

Strategy Research Pipeline

Required market, cost, or validation evidence is missing.

5 of 5 timeframes falling — aligned down

15M fallingADX 33.2 · 74%30M fallingADX 41 · 69%1H fallingADX 41.7 · 82%4H fallingADX 31.9 · 63%1D fallingADX 21.1 · 46%

The 15m, 30m, 1H, 4H and daily charts all point the same way right now.

Directional model score50%
ConvictionLow conviction
Backtest hit proxy~50%
Agents agreeing60%
Positive net returnNot established
Right here lately29% of 7 calls
Descriptive chart read changes ifWrong if price closes above 712.569 (2x ATR) or the trend gate drops.
Ask the agents to dig deeper Save as setup

Price chart1D · Trending (ADX 21)

Loading…

Why the agents think this

Reasons it could go up

Confirmation improves if Nasdaq 100 ETF holds above near-term support while dependency conflicts fade.

Reasons it could go down

The setup weakens if macro drivers reverse or price closes through the invalidation level.

This idea is wrong if

Wrong if price closes above 712.569 (2x ATR) or the trend gate drops.

What changed recently

Bias and directional model score now come from the deterministic advisor read. Evidence status separately controls whether any setup is actionable.

What might happen next

Continuation

Price respects the current regime and dependency confirmation remains intact.

Invalidation

Wrong if price closes above 712.569 (2x ATR) or the trend gate drops.

Want every agent’s score, key support/resistance levels, and the cross-market signals behind this read? Switch to Pro in the top bar for the full desk.

AI analysis to study, not orders to follow. You always decide — and never risk money you can’t afford to lose.

What would this cost me?

If Nasdaq 100 ETF reached 712.5693, the idea is wrong and you would be out. This works out what that costs on your account. Nothing here is a recommendation to take the trade — it is the price of being wrong.

A+ setup check

Run down the checklist before you act on Nasdaq 100 ETF. This is discipline, not a signal — a green gate means you aren’t forcing the trade, not that it will win.

  1. I wrote why the idea is wrong at 712.5693
  2. Reward:risk is at least :1
    This read has no target price, so reward:risk can't be computed. Treat that as a reason for caution, not a pass.
  3. I sized from risk, not from gut

0 of 2 checks — this is a B-setup. The edge is in passing on these. Trades are like buses; another comes along.

In the news

54 recent stories about this market this week — tone is mixed / neutral.

Unusually heavy news flow this week — more stories than normal.

News describes the mood of coverage, not a buy or sell call.

News & Events

54 new · 1 repeats (7d)
Tone this weekmixed / neutralacross 54 novel stories
Tone todaymixed / neutral5 stories in 24h
Earnings-related (7d)3news effect concentrates in earnings stories
HeadlineDateToneType
Robinhood Bets on 3 Crypto Sectors as Blockchain Fees Hit $25 Million - Yahoo Finance · google-news-rssJul 26, 2026mixed / neutral—
0726 crypto - Cecil Daily · google-news-rssJul 26, 2026mixed / neutral—
Investors use crypto exchanges to avoid Beijing’s controls on AI stocks - Financial Times · google-news-rssJul 26, 2026mostly negative—
Investors use crypto exchanges to avoid Chinese controls on AI stocks - Financial Times · google-news-rssJul 26, 2026mostly negative—
LINK FOREX Deepens Its Strategic Expansion in Latin America With Major Initiatives to Build a More Professional and Resilient Investment Ecosystem - Bluefield Daily Telegraph · google-news-rssJul 25, 2026mostly positive—
Forex injections cannot sustain cedi stability indefinitely — Tweneboa Kodua - GhanaWeb · google-news-rssJul 25, 2026mixed / neutral—
0725 crypto - Cecil Daily · google-news-rssJul 25, 2026mixed / neutral—
Sam Altman’s biometric startup World raises $52.5 million via crypto sale - TechCrunch · google-news-rssJul 24, 2026mixed / neutral—
Sam Altman’s biometric startup World raises $52.5M via crypto sale - TechCrunch · google-news-rssJul 24, 2026mixed / neutral—
Gold Trading Slippage Explained: XAU/USD Price Moves - Forex Factory · google-news-rssJul 24, 2026mixed / neutral—
EU deploys a 21st sanction package against Russia that escalates bans on 14 crypto firms - CoinDesk · google-news-rssJul 24, 2026mixed / neutral—
Why AUD/USD’s Triple Top Is Drawing More Attention - DailyForex · google-news-rssJul 24, 2026mostly positive—

News tone and event context only — not a trade signal. Tone measures how stories read, not what price should do.

← Dashboard

Nasdaq 100 ETF

equityTrending (ADX 21)
684.23-1.12%
Delayed · Actual · yahoo · as of 7/24/2026, 1:30:00 PM UTCNeed evidenceChart leans down1D chart50% model scoreLow conviction~50% backtest hit proxyLive chart read60% agreementagents right 29% here

5 of 5 timeframes falling — aligned down

15M fallingADX 33.2 · 74%30M fallingADX 41 · 69%1H fallingADX 41.7 · 82%4H fallingADX 31.9 · 63%1D fallingADX 21.1 · 46%

The 15m, 30m, 1H, 4H and daily charts all point the same way right now.

Session VWAP 686.95 · price 0.40% below · sellers in control (9 closes) · 15m bars, today's session — chart context, not a signal

Bearish read on QQQ: down trend with strength 0.46 (ADX 21). Backtested hit rate for this signal grade is about 50% over 5 days.

Path: loose trend (R² 0.504).

Run deeper analysisSave as setup

Price Chart

Trending (ADX 21)
Loading…
Overlays🔒 Core

Yellow cone: the ±1σ expected range fanning forward from now, widening with √time over the next 5 sessions (from realized volatility). It answers “where” as a range, not a direction — about 1 in 3 moves ends OUTSIDE it, so it is a range to study, not a boundary or a target.

Evidence Decision

Need evidence

Required market, cost, or validation evidence is missing.

Directional model score50%
Agent agreement60%
Cross-market confirmation15%
Cross-market conflict0%
Strategy and stage

Strategy Research Pipeline · researching

Positive net return

Not established

Net expectancy

Not established

Open evidence gates

replacement strategy candidate

Bull case

Confirmation improves if Nasdaq 100 ETF holds above near-term support while dependency conflicts fade.

Bear case

The setup weakens if macro drivers reverse or price closes through the invalidation level.

Chart read changes if

Wrong if price closes above 712.569 (2x ATR) or the trend gate drops.

What changed

Bias and directional model score now come from the deterministic advisor read. Evidence status separately controls whether any setup is actionable.

Your Risk

What would this cost me?

If Nasdaq 100 ETF reached 712.5693, the idea is wrong and you would be out. This works out what that costs on your account. Nothing here is a recommendation to take the trade — it is the price of being wrong.

Before You Act

A+ setup check

Run down the checklist before you act on Nasdaq 100 ETF. This is discipline, not a signal — a green gate means you aren’t forcing the trade, not that it will win.

  1. I wrote why the idea is wrong at 712.5693
  2. Reward:risk is at least :1
    This read has no target price, so reward:risk can't be computed. Treat that as a reason for caution, not a pass.
  3. I sized from risk, not from gut
  4. I have at least 2 independent confirmations and checked event/liquidity risk
  5. I'm at my A-game today

0 of 4 checks — this is a B-setup. The edge is in passing on these. Trades are like buses; another comes along.

Institutional analytics

Research analytics, non-executing by design

Market detail views surface data traceability and scenario context for the selected symbol.

Portfolio risk

Exposure, leverage, concentration, and drawdown analytics are built on versioned market data. Values appear only when they trace to a trusted dataset — nothing is estimated for display.

Factors and scenarios

Factor exposures and stress scenarios are computed only where a measured data source exists, and every shock definition is stated explicitly.

Execution quality

Spread, slippage, and other cost analytics stay educational until measured cost evidence passes deterministic checks.

Every displayed value must trace to a versioned market-data source. Sizing and setup content stays educational and non-executing; this platform never places trades.

Scenario Prompts

ContinuationPrice respects the current regime and dependency confirmation remains intact.
InvalidationWrong if price closes above 712.569 (2x ATR) or the trend gate drops.

Model Score Trend

Waiting for history

Directional model score across recent runs. This is not a probability of profit.

Technicals

as of 2026-07-24
52-week range position67.3% · -8.6% off the high0% = at the low 551.68, 100% = at the high 748.65
Today vs its own history-1.117% · 68th percentile0.99× its typical daily move (outlier-robust z)
Volatility rank70th percentile20d realized vs 5y of dailies · currently 1.704%/day
Path quality (20 bars)loose trendR² 0.504 · slope -0.2211%/bar — high R² means the arrow is trustworthy
Closing streak3 days downconsecutive daily closes in one direction
Expected move (1σ)±1.704% / day · ±3.811% / 5dabout 2 in 3 similar periods stay inside; realized close-to-close vol (30d), sqrt-of-time scaling

Pivot levels from 2026-07-23

R3708.69H4697.94
R2703.67H3694.95
R1697.82P 692.80
S1686.95
S2681.93L3688.97
S3676.08L4685.98
Classic (left) and Camarilla (right) — arithmetic on the prior session, not predictions.

Distance from averages

SMA20-3.862% (-1.94 ATR)
SMA50-4.741% (-2.4 ATR)
SMA200+6.384% (+2.89 ATR)

Typical session ranges

Asia (22–07 UTC)—
London (07–13 UTC)—
New York (13–21 UTC)1.707% · n=21
London–NY overlap (13–16 UTC)1.491% · n=21
hourly bars, ~1 month

Monthly tendency

About 5 yearly samples per month — a tendency at best, never a signal.

Source: QQQ via Yahoo chart API (daily, 5y). Descriptive measurements, not signals or advice.

Agent Breakdown

4 agents
AgentBiasModel scoreAssessmentKey Levels
Technical agentbearish50%Nasdaq 100 ETF technical structure is bearish inside a Trending (ADX 21) regime.Invalidation: 1H close above 688.34ATR 7.66⚠ event or volatility riskS 680.12 / 678.08R 688.34 / 691.09
News / sentiment agentbearish42%Nasdaq 100 ETF is scored through equity beta, volatility regime, real yields, sector leadership, and stock-specific momentum.conf adj -0.070—
Regime / correlation agentbearish48%Measured strong positive correlation with SPY (0.9036); regime classified as Trending (ADX 21).regime Trending (ADX 21)stability 0.715corr regime calmrolling ρ 0.904driver SPY—
Risk agentneutral62%Position sizing should be reduced until event and volatility risk normalizes.disagreement 0.505⚠ reduced size⚠ monitor event window—